Jump to content

Talk:Anthony Watmough

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

'Controversy' detail

[edit]

Is the degree of detail re the Anthony Watmough domestic controversy really necessary? (diff) In particular, does the de-facto partner have to be named? I propose reducing the paragraph to a few sentences and removing names. ~ Florrie • talk • 14:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AVO details reduced

[edit]

Good point Florrie; I have reduced the details as recommended. SJ2571 (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'd forgotten all about it! ~ Florrie • talk • 14:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Category Addition

[edit]

I think he should be added to a category for wife bashers. Any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.50.27 (talk) 09:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AndreMarti68 (talk) 06:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)== removal of controversy section ==[reply]

It's my view that having this section violates our 'undue weight' policies, so I've removed it. Happy to discuss... Privatemusings (talk) 02:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's something that has got relevance. I think it would be best to have that information in the article and bring in more material about his game into the article. GarethHolteDavies (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

let's try and figure out how / if that's possible.... the controversy was reported locally, but then so are Choc's comments regularly... there was (for example) another incident where Choc didn't exactly cover himself in glory on the footy show (fairly high profile rugby league / entertaintment talk show on thursday nights). So how important is this incident in painting a encyclopedic picture of the chap? I'd say it represents about 5% in terms of importance in Choc's career / life etc. - whaddya you reckon? If we can move towards agreeing on that one (mileage may vary, of course..) we can see the extent of the article expansion necessary to ensure the 'controversy' bit meets the 'undue weight' provisions.... cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 20:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)in case it's not totally clear - I'm minded to remove that bit once more soonish....[reply]
I'll remove the section to stimulate further discussion - I think it's best left out at the momemnt. Privatemusings (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Will put my hand up to improve the article by fleshing it out like I have done with the likes of Brent Kite and Steve Matai and giving a more rounded feel.Londo06 23:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the issue was resolved, I agree it should either be removed or reduced to a one sentence entry. Not sure at all how it is relevant. •Florrie•leave a note• 23:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
how would you feel about removing the section pending the article work, Londo? - my reading of the WP:BLP stuff is that that would be a good idea - I wonder if you might be able to point me in the direction of any sources to flesh the article out too... I'm well up for helping :-) Privatemusings (talk) 03:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I figure it's a good idea, so I'll remove the section again, for now Privatemusings (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably let you run with the football on this one; I'll be tidying up WC player articles in general.Londo06 10:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly singling Watmough out, but this combined with alleged behaviour at 2009 MWRLFC Season Launch points to a pattern of abuse
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Anthony Watmough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anthony Watmough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anthony_Watmough&oldid=1211464342"